Skip to content
CityLedger

Best for remote workers

A paycheck that stretches, an educated workforce, and a healthy job market to plug into.

Top 50 of 300 metros, ranked by our published formula.

When your paycheck doesn't depend on the local job market, the math of where to live changes completely, and that's the case this ranking is designed for. It blends affordability, the education level of the area, and overall job-market health, on the logic that remote workers want their income to stretch while still landing somewhere with reliable services and a deep professional community to plug into. The result favors places where a portable salary buys a comfortable life without isolating you from peers or fallback opportunities.

Treat the top entries as strong defaults for someone bringing their own income, with affordability doing much of the heavy lifting near the top. The caveat is that this blend can't see the things remote work actually lives or dies on day to day: broadband quality, coworking options, flight connections, and time-zone overlap with your team. Use the ranking to narrow your search, then verify the practical logistics for the specific metros you like.

  1. 1
    Boston, MA
    Affordability: 100/100
    83
    Livability
  2. 2
    Raleigh, NC
    Affordability: 98/100
    85
    Livability
  3. 3
    Washington, DC
    Affordability: 100/100
    81
    Livability
  4. 4
    Bridgeport, CT
    Affordability: 100/100
    79
    Livability
  5. 5
    Austin, TX
    Affordability: 92/100
    83
    Livability
  6. 6
    Denver, CO
    Affordability: 93/100
    83
    Livability
  7. 7
    San Jose, CA
    Affordability: 100/100
    82
    Livability
  8. 8
    San Francisco, CA
    Affordability: 100/100
    77
    Livability
  9. 9
    Rochester, MN
    Affordability: 87/100
    88
    Livability
  10. 10
    Charlottesville, VA
    Affordability: 79/100
    84
    Livability
  11. 11
    Lexington Park, MD
    Affordability: 100/100
    78
    Livability
  12. 12
    Manchester, NH
    Affordability: 88/100
    80
    Livability
  13. 13
    Bremerton, WA
    Affordability: 96/100
    80
    Livability
  14. 14
    Provo, UT
    Affordability: 95/100
    74
    Livability
  15. 15
    Seattle, WA
    Affordability: 90/100
    78
    Livability
  16. 16
    Madison, WI
    Affordability: 68/100
    82
    Livability
  17. 17
    Boulder, CO
    Affordability: 82/100
    83
    Livability
  18. 18
    Trenton, NJ
    Affordability: 90/100
    73
    Livability
  19. 19
    Portland, ME
    Affordability: 66/100
    76
    Livability
  20. 20
    Salt Lake City, UT
    Affordability: 87/100
    74
    Livability
  21. 21
    Burlington, VT
    Affordability: 59/100
    77
    Livability
  22. 22
    Oxnard, CA
    Affordability: 96/100
    72
    Livability
  23. 23
    Columbia, MO
    Affordability: 62/100
    74
    Livability
  24. 24
    Fort Collins, CO
    Affordability: 68/100
    75
    Livability
  25. 25
    Huntsville, AL
    Affordability: 71/100
    74
    Livability
  26. 26
    Minneapolis, MN
    Affordability: 71/100
    74
    Livability
  27. 27
    San Diego, CA
    Affordability: 81/100
    72
    Livability
  28. 28
    Naples, FL
    Affordability: 70/100
    76
    Livability
  29. 29
    Baltimore, MD
    Affordability: 74/100
    69
    Livability
  30. 30
    Ogden, UT
    Affordability: 83/100
    72
    Livability
  31. 31
    Santa Fe, NM
    Affordability: 62/100
    75
    Livability
  32. 32
    Greeley, CO
    Affordability: 91/100
    70
    Livability
  33. 33
    Urban Honolulu, HI
    Affordability: 75/100
    71
    Livability
  34. 34
    Santa Cruz, CA
    Affordability: 83/100
    72
    Livability
  35. 35
    Santa Rosa, CA
    Affordability: 86/100
    74
    Livability
  36. 36
    Nashville, TN
    Affordability: 68/100
    69
    Livability
  37. 37
    Ann Arbor, MI
    Affordability: 62/100
    71
    Livability
  38. 38
    Sioux Falls, SD
    Affordability: 65/100
    77
    Livability
  39. 39
    Hilton Head Island, SC
    Affordability: 63/100
    72
    Livability
  40. 40
    Des Moines, IA
    Affordability: 70/100
    72
    Livability
  41. 41
    Durham, NC
    Affordability: 52/100
    70
    Livability
  42. 42
    Portland, OR
    Affordability: 72/100
    70
    Livability
  43. 43
    Bloomington, IL
    Affordability: 55/100
    71
    Livability
  44. 44
    Atlanta, GA
    Affordability: 68/100
    62
    Livability
  45. 45
    Charleston, SC
    Affordability: 61/100
    67
    Livability
  46. 46
    Bend, OR
    Affordability: 69/100
    73
    Livability
  47. 47
    Kansas City, MO
    Affordability: 64/100
    69
    Livability
  48. 48
    Worcester, MA
    Affordability: 73/100
    64
    Livability
  49. 49
    Traverse City, MI
    Affordability: 59/100
    71
    Livability
  50. 50
    Midland, TX
    Affordability: 71/100
    72
    Livability

Common questions

Why does education level matter if I work remotely?
It's a proxy for the depth of the local professional community, the quality of nearby services, and how easy it is to find peers or your next role if remote work dries up. It doesn't measure your own qualifications, only the makeup of the surrounding metro.
Does this ranking consider internet speed?
No, and that's its biggest blind spot for remote work. Broadband availability and reliability vary block by block, so once you have a shortlist, check actual service options at specific addresses before committing.
Should I just pick the cheapest city instead?
Affordability is weighted heavily here, but the cheapest metro isn't always the best fit if it lacks the services, connectivity, or community you'd want long term. Compare a cheap option against a balanced one in our compare tool to see what you'd trade away.