Sioux Falls vs Springfield
Metro-area medians — Sioux Falls, SD-MN Metro Area vs Springfield, IL Metro Area — not the cities proper.
Sioux Falls comes out ahead, winning 5 of the 8 clearly-decided measures.
Sioux Falls and Springfield are closely matched on both cost of living and household income. Adjusted for local prices, a typical paycheck stretches further in Sioux Falls.
For your salary & household
Enter your pay and household size to see what it's really worth here — the numbers update live and the link stays shareable.
On $75,000 for just you, Sioux Falls leaves you about $5,545/yr better off after tax and local prices.
Take-home estimates a single filer taking the standard deduction (2025 federal brackets, FICA, and state income tax) and isn't tax advice. “Real value” rebases take-home to average U.S. prices using the BEA cost-of-living index; the per-person figure uses the OECD square-root equivalence scale.
Choose Sioux Falls for
- + Livability (CityLedger)
- + Cost-adjusted income (pay's real value)
- + Unemployment
- + Average commute
- + Air quality (median AQI)
Choose Springfield for
- + Median rent
- + Median home value
- + Bachelor's degree or higher
Sioux Falls vs Springfield — frequently asked
- Is Sioux Falls cheaper than Springfield?
- They are about even — the overall cost of living in the Sioux Falls and Springfield metros is within 3% of each other (BEA Regional Price Parities), so neither is meaningfully cheaper.
- Which has higher household income, Sioux Falls or Springfield?
- Sioux Falls has the higher median household income — $82,509 versus $80,190 (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS), about 3% more.
- Does a paycheck go further in Sioux Falls or Springfield?
- A paycheck stretches further in Sioux Falls. Adjusted for local prices, the median income is worth $91,038 there versus $86,463 in Springfield.
- Which has cheaper rent, Sioux Falls or Springfield?
- Springfield has cheaper rent — a median of $1,047/mo versus $1,094/mo (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS).