Chicago vs Houston
Metro-area medians — Chicago-Naperville-Elgin, IL-IN Metro Area vs Houston-Pasadena-The Woodlands, TX Metro Area — not the cities proper.
Chicago comes out ahead, winning 5 of the 7 clearly-decided measures.
Houston is about 5% cheaper to live in, while Chicago households earn about 11% more. Adjusted for local prices, a typical paycheck stretches further in Chicago.
For your salary & household
Enter your pay and household size to see what it's really worth here — the numbers update live and the link stays shareable.
On $75,000 for just you, Houston leaves you about $6,564/yr better off after tax and local prices.
Take-home estimates a single filer taking the standard deduction (2025 federal brackets, FICA, and state income tax) and isn't tax advice. “Real value” rebases take-home to average U.S. prices using the BEA cost-of-living index; the per-person figure uses the OECD square-root equivalence scale.
Choose Chicago for
- + Livability (CityLedger)
- + Cost-adjusted income (pay's real value)
- + Median household income
- + Bachelor's degree or higher
- + Air quality (median AQI)
Chicago vs Houston — frequently asked
- Is Chicago cheaper than Houston?
- Houston is cheaper: its overall cost of living runs about 5% below Chicago's (BEA Regional Price Parities).
- Which has higher household income, Chicago or Houston?
- Chicago has the higher median household income — $90,770 versus $81,417 (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS), about 11% more.
- Does a paycheck go further in Chicago or Houston?
- A paycheck stretches further in Chicago. Adjusted for local prices, the median income is worth $87,620 there versus $82,549 in Houston.
- Which has cheaper rent, Chicago or Houston?
- Rents are close — $1,469/mo in the Chicago metro versus $1,469/mo in Houston (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS).