Boston vs Washington
Metro-area medians — Boston-Cambridge-Newton, MA-NH Metro Area vs Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV Metro Area — not the cities proper.
Washington comes out ahead, winning 4 of the 7 clearly-decided measures.
Boston and Washington cost about the same to live in, but Washington households earn about 7% more. Adjusted for local prices, a typical paycheck stretches further in Washington.
For your salary & household
Enter your pay and household size to see what it's really worth here — the numbers update live and the link stays shareable.
On $75,000 for just you, Boston leaves you about $27/yr better off after tax and local prices.
Take-home estimates a single filer taking the standard deduction (2025 federal brackets, FICA, and state income tax) and isn't tax advice. “Real value” rebases take-home to average U.S. prices using the BEA cost-of-living index; the per-person figure uses the OECD square-root equivalence scale.
Choose Washington for
- + Cost-adjusted income (pay's real value)
- + Median household income
- + Median home value
- + Bachelor's degree or higher
Boston vs Washington — frequently asked
- Is Boston cheaper than Washington?
- They are about even — the overall cost of living in the Boston and Washington metros is within 3% of each other (BEA Regional Price Parities), so neither is meaningfully cheaper.
- Which has higher household income, Boston or Washington?
- Washington has the higher median household income — $126,244 versus $117,825 (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS), about 7% more.
- Does a paycheck go further in Boston or Washington?
- A paycheck stretches further in Washington. Adjusted for local prices, the median income is worth $115,944 there versus $108,829 in Boston.
- Which has cheaper rent, Boston or Washington?
- Washington has cheaper rent — a median of $2,037/mo versus $2,093/mo (U.S. Census Bureau, ACS).